Monday, February 10, 2025

Pay me now or pay me later.

 

You may be able to see the details better if you click to enlarge.

 

My retoucher tells me things. 

 

OK, not really, because I do most of my own retouching. But a colleague of mine who is a professional retoucher sees things I don't see, like photos done by photographers who are less experienced and less detail oriented than another one might be. I wondered why anyone would be unwilling to pay for good photography, but would be willing to pay to fix bad work. Probably because they don’t anticipate the additional cost. When my colleague shared with me some of the things she has been asked to fix I decided to write this post to try to spare whomever I can the pain of totally unnecessarily high retouching bills and time wastage due to backing and forthing by e-mail days and weeks after the shoot.


Wouldn't it be far less painful, and maybe even cost a similar amount to get a good, experienced photographer who knows what to look for while shooting (and tells you how much time you need to get good shots) and just takes good looking photos in the first place? 

 

My illustration is extreme to make a point, but here are some things that aren't uncommon: having one side of a collar pop out from under a jacket lapel, wrinkles, an earring hanging wrong*, lipstick/gloss having partially worn off or hastily applied, mascara smudged, hair on face or food between teeth after lunch.

(*I know you can't really see it here but viewed at full size, or in one of the other frames  where the earring showed more, you'd see it and you'd be bothered.)

 

These are all things that can happen, and that a retoucher may be asked to fix, but could so easily have been avoided with a little care. 

 

Despite the many advantages of digital photography (it's hard to imagine we used to shoot on film and had no Photoshop), when the digital revolution happened it removed a huge barrier to entry into the world of "professional photography" and made way for the notion that "anything can be done in Photoshop." When people proceed with the idea that any number of indiscretions can be fixed in Photoshop, there is a clear path created to a loss of precision and professionalism. 

 

While it may be true that anything can be fixed in Photoshop, there's a cost. Good retouching can cost a lot. The point this that there is risk associated with sloppy photography. From a practical POV, some issues like those on the left photo are not even really fixable, meaning clients end up settling for poor quality, and organizers end up with unhappy bosses.

 

Here's another reason to make sure you hire a good photographer...it is clear to me that there are lots of people who can't really tell the difference between a bad picture and a good one. This is not a criticism...their skill sets lie elsewhere. So if you don't know what's good or bad but you understand that photography is sending a message/telling a story, it really behooves you to hire an expert who does know what makes an excellent photo. Otherwise the story your photo is telling may not be the one you want it to be telling. 

 

While we're here I have a couple of "Don'ts" to pass on regarding portrait wardrobe, because what you wear can play a big part in the success of your photo. Neither the blouse nor the jacket were great choices. Why not? The shape of the jacket and sheen of the fabric meant that unless I could get it to sit perfectly flat on my body (which I couldn't) it would show wrinkles I wouldn't be able to fix in retouching. So make sure your jacket fits and sits well if you wear one. 

 

Also, for some reason, one side of the collar on this jacket tended to stick out way further across the shoulder area than the other side did. I needed fabric tape to pull them in and even them out for the photo on the right. It's rare to have time at a business portrait session to be fiddling around with fabric tape. And the blouse was made of very soft, floppy, wrinkle-prone, patterned fabric. I had to use a lot of fabric tape to get it to hold its shape in the photo on the right, and I still had to retouch it. If your shirt collar can't sit properly without being taped into shape (!) wear a different one.

 

That's it for now. Good luck with your next photo shoot! 

 

kathryn@hollinrake.com

hollinrake.com

corporateportraits.ca

 

 

 

 


Monday, February 3, 2025

Dream Job: The Tour de Bleu Calendar

 

This is the fuzziest photo (or grid of photos) I have ever uploaded and that's on purpose! Sorry. These photos were created to be shared internally by the organization, so I can show you kind of what they looked like, but not who's in them. I wish I could. But, privacy.

 

In the fall of 2024 something wonderful happened. I received an e-mail I almost didn't think was legitimate as it began with "Good Afternoon". But the sender did refer to some specific work on my website that gave them the idea I might be a good fit for their project so I replied.

 

What followed was the commencement of one of the most interesting and creative projects I have done in a while, thanks, to some extent, to a series of fake book covers I did in 2023.

 

The project -- a calendar to feature a series of creative, whimsical and maybe humorous images of twelve Tour de Bleu cyclists and their bikes. The calendar pages would be auctioned off at the Tour de Bleu gala fundraiser;  the models would be the winning bidders. Between 2023 and 2024 the Tour de Bleu raised 11.9 million dollars for the William Osler Health System’s Adolescent Intensive Day Program for youth struggling with self-harm and suicidal thoughts. Here's more about the event and the organization: https://www.petergilganfoundation.org/tour-de-bleu/

 

Particularly given the target charities it took me zero seconds to want to be involved.

 

All I had to do was collaborate, organize and execute twelve photo shoots with some of the busiest people I have ever met.

 

What was so great about this job?

 

I had a lot of creative control. I was allowed to create each image as a stand-alone piece with no stylistic limitations or restrictions...the final set of shots didn't have to match.  I got to bump brains with some very fun and creative people.  I got to see and explore a number of interesting places I would otherwise never have had a chance to see. I got to work with a great new photo assistant, my son (as well as my usual, awesome assistant, Ashley).

 

What were the challenges?

 

In some cases I got to scout the locations prior to the shoot dates, which I always like to do. But even then there were challenges. Logistically and budget-wise we just didn't have the capacity to deal with getting (and paying for) location permits, so where that might have been a thing we knew we'd have to shoot fast. Since we had no time for weather days (ie. postponements) we'd have to shoot rain or shine. Despite my advising that we have back-up inside locations, we were pretty committed to shooting in the various outdoor locations the "models" came up with because they were much more interesting and varied. Thankfully, with seven out of twelve locations being outside, we did not get rained out once. It came close, but you'd never know because I brought the sun with me in my light cases.

 

It was also increasingly cold.  We shot way later into the fall than originally intended due to people's schedules, thus the sparsely leaved trees in at least one of the shots. Another week and we'd have been out of luck at that last location.

 

And I did have to Photoshop in a couple of skies.

 

We went to this park during off-hours, set up and shot very quickly. I had fully pre-visualized what the set-up would be so we were very efficient. We used a fishing rod and fishing line with a safety pin to make the scarf fly.

 

In the case of the red scarf shot (top left in the grid) I knew the way it "flew" in the park would be no good, so it was always my plan to reshoot the scarf in studio (on green screen)  where I'd have more control, and composite it into the final shot. I had to do still more in Photoshop to tweak the flying effect. What I didn't want to have to do in-studio or in Photoshop was create the part of the scarf that went around the model's neck, which is why we also had to shoot the scarf actually on the model on location.

 

Did I mention how busy these people are? To make planning even more of a challenge some of the models were basically voluntold to participate by their bidding "associates". So, one person would bid on a calendar page but assign the photo shoot to someone else. This made for some lengthy and, shall we say, erratic e-mail threads. And instead of photographing twelve people, we ended up photographing twenty-two (because there were groups...surprise!)

 

What else? 

 

Hilariously, although it did not feel hilarious at the time, following the desire of our model I had selected a spot at this location that on the shoot date was totally taken over by this giant window cleaning apparatus. The operator kindly shared with me that they were scheduled to be there for four days. Luckily our model had access to another even better location nearby so we still got a great shot.

 

At one spot downtown our model had requested a certain spot for their shoot. I scouted it in advance so I'd know which angles would work if it was sunny or rainy on the day. We arrive to find an enormous window washing apparatus ensconced in the middle of the space. The operator tells us it will be anchored there for four days. Excellent. There is nowhere in that space we can shoot. This location is unusable. Luckily, our model had some pull and showed us to an even better space. Still outdoors, but not there. Fantastic!

 

And talking about being lucky, after all these years of dreading something  like this happening it finally did. We were on our way out of Toronto to Burlington and as I am pulling away from the pick-up spot for my assistant near Exhibition Place a driver hops out of his car, comes up to my window, and tells me I have a flat tire.

 

Thank goodness I am fanatical about leaving early for shoots. Of course this is the day we have one shoot in the morning in Burlington, requiring the most complicated lighting of any shoot in the project followed by another shoot in Brampton, both on tight schedules. The one in Burlington is at a restaurant that opens at 11:00 so there is no going over...we are supposed to be out of there by 10:30 and absolutely must be out of there by 11:00 a.m. And it was incredibly difficult to even get this shoot booked...rescheduling is not an option.

 

So, by some miracle I am able to limp my car a few yards to the last parking spot in the only parking lot I can see in the area. And I call CAA, while I get my assistant to call a cargo cab. I call my husband who drops everything  (thank goodness it was a day he was in town and could even do that) and picks up my spare key from home on the way. I tell CAA my husband will drive over and meet them at my car. They say no go; their memberships are with people, not their cars. So I buy my husband a CAA membership and Bob's your uncle! We unload my car into the cargo van and head to Burlington. The driver says we have to pay $45 cash and it's $20 extra for the cargo. Who carries that kind of cash these days? Miracle, I had it! We're only half an hour late. We set up like lightning and we get the shot. Everyone is happy. We call another cargo cab who lets us pay by credit card and quietly says it's $10 extra for the cargo, as if we might have a problem with this (so looks like they make up the cargo rate on the spot based on what they think people will pay), and we go back to my car. It's all fixed. We drive to Brampton. After shoot #2 I drop my assistant at her home and buy my husband a bottle of his favourite scotch. How lucky were we?

 

Originally we thought we'd schedule the twelve shoots over six shoot dates...two per day over three weekends. So cute we thought we could make that happen. We ended up shooting on ten different dates, weekdays and weekends. I had also been under the impression everyone to be photographed was in Toronto. If you count Burlington, Brampton, Milton and Peterborough as Toronto then yes, we shot in Toronto. I spent fifteen hours location scouting and that wasn't even all the locations. The fastest shoot was probably less than half an hour...good thing I'd scouted that one. But on average they were maybe two hours all in including set-up and tear down.

 

I don't even know how many hours I spent on post-production. In several of the shots I wanted the bikes to look as if they were moving but we had to shoot them standing still. As an example, in one shot a family of three kids on bikes and a scooter was to appear to be winning a race with their competitive racer parent. It would have been virtually impossible to photograph them in the park with the background I wanted, with artificial light (assistant holding my flash)  if I had allowed them to actually ride, so on my count they all hopped up onto their bikes and the little guy on the scooter shot his foot out behind him, over and over until I had the shot. They did a great acting job. But, if I hadn't added motion blur in post (not as quick and easy as one might think) it would have looked boring and static.

 

I also learned that cleats and clip-in pedals are not conducive to balancing on an unsupported, stationary bike. Noted!

 

So those are the highlights of my 2024 dream job. Overall, a very challenging job, but worth it in so many ways. They will almost certainly never read this, but a huge thanks to the people who helped herd the cats including executive assistants whose job I would never want. This project took over much of my mind, and many chunks of time for the better part of two months. Thank-you to the donors for allowing me into their busy lives to create art with, and out of them, including one major collaborator who lent me his studio, his creativity and his considerable energy for our shoot together...he knows who he is.   

 

It's not often a job like this comes along. I met some of the nicest and most inspiring people. I'm proud of the images we created together. And next time, now that the first calendar has been distributed to the group, at least donors will know what they're signing up for!

 

 

kathryn@hollinrake.com

hollinrake.com

corporateportraits.ca

Tuesday, January 14, 2025

Serious profile photos


 

Let's be serious.

 

Just kidding. But I am going to touch on the idea of the "serious" business photo.

 

One of the first questions clients often ask is: "Should I smile?"

And generally, the answer is that you should do whatever feels and looks like you, with the caveat that you are trying to initiate connection with people, and people generally respond more favourably to someone who appears to be, if not outright joyful, at least approachable. 

 

I've written about this before. As have so many. In fact it was ten years ago (!) that I found (and shared) a handy diagrammatic breakdown of what one organization has determined makes the perfect profile photo -- https://photofeeler-blog.s3.amazonaws.com/perfect-photo-infographic.jpg

-- and you can see that, according to them, smiles are really important. 

 

However, sometimes there are good reasons not to smile. Some people just aren't smiley. Sometimes a smiley photo just wouldn't feel right, if, say, you are the CEO of a funeral home, or work in a similarly serious organization. Even so, I just wanted to make the point in this post that there is (scary) serious, and there's (still approachable) serious. And no matter who you are, if you are using a profile photo at all, I suggest it will most likely serve you better if you look at least somewhat accessible. Unless anger is your brand.

 

As always my suggestions are presented to help most people, most of the time. They are not rules, and they don't cover every circumstance.

 

Always remember what the goal of your profile portrait is. And remember that generally you want to draw people towards you, not frighten them off.  

 

kathryn@hollinrake.com

hollinrake.com 

corporateportraits.ca


Wednesday, December 11, 2024

Individual business portraits - put all your eggs in the good basket

 

 

When I have a client come to my studio for a business portrait session I always suggest they bring wardrobe options. We review the options, shooting test shots if necessary, and choose the outfit that works best. If it's the case that the client needs one great shot, we do the whole shoot in the one best wardrobe option. We don't shoot all the outfits, because we don't want to discover that the hands-down best expression happened in the wrong outfit. (Link below to a post written by a happy client of mine who mentioned this exact thing.)

 

Why am I bringing this up? Because this is not the way everyone works. And without an explanation my method might sound to some as if they aren't getting as much from a photographer like me as they are from one who advertises based on a quantity model. This what they want you to think.

 

Here's a short story about an author shoot for a publisher. We were shooting a book cover. There were three dresses to choose from. We could all see which dress looked best so we started with that. By the third dress, which even the author didn't really like, her energy level had dropped way down.

 

Keep in mind that this is someone who knew there was a lot at stake in terms of getting this book cover right, and was a pro at being in front of a camera.

 

We kept shooting, because the publisher wanted options. But we weren't actually getting any viable "options". The author was getting increasingly tired and disappointed. We weren't getting good shots. We spent a bunch of time and energy shooting a bunch of images that would never see the light of day, and by the end of the shoot our author's sunny disposition had evaporated.

 

It was the (not actual) "need" for quantity that compromised the experience for the subject, and set us all up for disappointment, even though we had successfully captured a winning shot!

 

In this digital age when it's so easy to offer quantity – we're no longer limited by the number of frames on a roll of film and the cost of buying it, processing it, etc. (although there are still costs with digital, which people don't acknowledge enough, but that's not for today's post) - it is so easy to use as a selling point the number of pictures a photographer will take or the client will get. "150 photos!" (or whatever). And it's easy to say that a client can change as many times as they want, and we'll change backgrounds and lighting as many times as we can in a given period, say, an hour. Of course there's always an option for those with a leaner budget who know they only want one "look"...if you look at the detailed description it'll be for a very short, strictly time-limited session, usually something like 15 minutes.

 

What if I told you that it can take an hour to get one “best photo of me I've ever had!”?  Does it make sense that you will get the value you want, and that you're being sold, if you change three times in that hour, or if you have 15 minutes to get from "I hate having my picture taken" to "wow, that was so much less painful that I thought it would be and I really love this photo!"?

 

I'm not saying don't shoot more than one outfit. I am explaining why I don't use a business model based on getting as many photos as you possibly can in a strictly limited period of time. I am suggesting that you consider what you really need and plan with your photographer accordingly. Especially for people who don't love being photographed, think about what you are setting yourself up for if it's all about shooting as much and as fast as possible. 

 

Using the Goldilocks principle, the ideal would be to avoid the "too hot" option (big pile of less than stellar pics) or the "too cold" (short, fast, impersonal shoot). A "just right" shoot will be based on your particular needs, and will not compromise on quality.

 

The experience will affect the results. Care and attention to detail will affect the results. Set yourself up for success.  

 

Link to client LinkedIn post: 

 

https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7268692765838848000/

 

kathryn@hollinrake.com

hollinrake.com

corporateportraits.ca 

Tuesday, August 20, 2024

Window Light Portraits

 

Me in my studio with my (pretend) window light

 

Ah, natural light. How awesome is it not to need any lighting equipment and just to use the biggest light source in the world — the sky — modified by the most ubiquitous modifiers around — windows. I have always been so jealous of photographers whose studios have perfect sized and shaped windows in just the right places. So, finally, I just knocked out a wall.

Just kidding. I did not do that. I used lighting like I always do to create the look I wanted. No hoping it’s a bright day. No limiting shoots to daylight hours. No limiting the background to what’s actually behind/beside the window. I can put my “window” wherever I want.

That’s pretty much all I have to say about window light in my studio. Or anywhere else I might be shooting.


The set for the portrait above.

Questions?

Yes, this is possibly my shortest blog post ever. Now that you're here maybe you'd like to peruse my archive! Or, reach out and let me know what you'd like me to write about next. What do you want to know about working with a professional photographer, planning your next shoot, or...? Let me know! I'm here to help.

kathryn@hollinrake.com

hollinrake.com

Tuesday, July 30, 2024

Headshots and profile pics - comparing apples to apples

 

It seems nobody likes the word “negotiation”. But if you Google the meaning of “negotiate” the first dictionary meaning that comes up is “obtain or bring about by discussion”. When hiring a photographer, some discussion is almost always going to be required, to ensure that you are going to end up with precisely what you want and need.

 

I understand the temptation and the desire to treat hiring a photographer like buying an easily defined, simple product, but wanting it to be that simple doesn’t mean it is.  Think of it as slightly more complicated than getting a haircut and colour…some dialogue is required, the provider’s skill and experience make a big difference, and with photography timelines and post-production vary. It’s not that photography has to be complicated. But the reality is that there are different approaches to any photography project (even the smallest); so often, photographers quoting for the same client are not really quoting the same job. And it’s not because any one of the photographers quoting has decided that what they’re quoting is the only way to do the job.

 

Some photographers, knowing some clients “don’t speak photographer” will oversimplify service and product offerings as part of their sales technique. But if quality is a priority, or even a factor, I’d assert this is may not be a route to the best experience and product. You are not buying a fixed quality, fixed cost commodity; photography can cost more or less depending on precisely what parameters make sense and are possible for any given job and it’s to your advantage to spend a little time to try to get the right combo to get the best results for the budget you have.

 

If a provider of a service with flexible parameters (like photography) submits a proposal with an invitation to respond with feedback and an offer to address that feedback with an updated quote, assume they mean it (not that they were over-quoting and are willing to back down if you confront them, yuck, and not that the estimated total cost is indicative of anything without reference to the breakdown). 

 

It is not a win when a job with undefined parameters (many creative projects) is quoted with an invitation to circle back and confirm the parameters that make the most sense and will result in the best client experience and final product, if a cheaper quote ends the discussion (or worse, if there wasn’t even another quote and the job is just cancelled over cost). Examples of the outcomes are everywhere (eg. not great photos that the people in them are not happy with).

 

What’s missing is that rather than the budget being tighter than the first quote (which it may very well be), the cheaper quote is almost certainly for a different looking job. In other words, the first quoter may not even be more expensive (or much more expensive) than the second one…maybe Photographer A quoted a full day and Photographer B quoted a half day. And if this has happened, it’s not that the second photographer is a faster shooter. Any photographer can shoot fast. And any pro will tell you that rushing, if it’s not necessary to do so, is not the best path to an excellent experience or results. That same pro will also understand if it’s the case that there just isn’t the time or the budget for a more time-consuming shoot.


Just a quick note on why I keep referring to both the experience and the results: In the case of photography of people, it pretty much goes without saying that the more pleasant the experience the better the photos will be. Something to keep in mind.

 

When quoting a project (ie. a photo shoot), especially for clients who either haven’t hired a photographer before, or don’t know what their budget is, or don’t know how much time they’ll be able to make subjects available for their sessions, etc. (these are some of the undefined parameters) the photographer has to start somewhere, so based on whatever info they’ve been able to get they’ll prepare an estimate, often with an express invitation to discuss, because they know they may be quoting apples to oranges.

 

Nobody wants to take days to nail down a quote by going back and forth. So as I’ve advised before, pick up the phone. It is almost always more efficient and productive to talk about creative jobs, than it is to limit exchanges to e-mail.

 

Back to the example above, let’s say a client asks “how much for 10 headshots?”. Photographer A, a very good, experienced pro, might offer their expert opinion that in an ideal world they’d get 30 minutes per person, so they quote that with the caveat that if that doesn’t work for the client’s team (time- or budget-wise), they can revise the quote to better fit the circumstances once more about those circumstances is known. Photographer B, whose work is OK, is used to never having any time to shoot so they quote 10 minutes per person. (There may also be other things about  Photographer B’s style and methods that aren’t the same as Photographer A’s,  including the level and quality of retouching.

 

Photographer B’s estimate is going to be way cheaper. But at what cost?

 

The cost of shooting “slower” is more $. The cost of shooting faster may be that some of the subjects just don’t have time to get to their calm, happy, confident place, and attention is not paid to details like wrinkles in clothes, hairs out of place, etc. Another cost may be your time as the organizer, if you have to chase down everyone’s selects for retouching (when Photographer A built in time to choose selects with the subjects during their sessions.)

 

Maybe the client’s team really only has 10 minutes each to spare. If so one might want to find out what Photographer A would charge for this much shorter shoot. It may turn out the price is now much closer to Photographer B’s. You could actually hire the better photographer for not much more money than the cheaper one.

 

The point is that the question that should always be asked is “are the photographers quoting the same thing?” because I guarantee if the quotes are significantly different they are not. Either the parameters are notably different, and/or the quality of the work is not going to be equal. (It’s worth keeping in mind why you are getting professional photos in the first place…and that while good photos support brands, bad ones can actively do the opposite.)

 

Don’t be afraid to negotiate, ie. discuss, if you are invited to do so… especially where there are potentially unfixed parameters within a project. Every job is different and the goal is to get the best results possible within the allowable mix of time, logistics and budget. You may be able to get a way better result by going back to the quoter once you have a better idea of these things than you will by just going with the cheaper quote. Negotiation does not have to be complicated or take much more time. And the cost of not bothering may be a significantly less great experience, and less great product.

 

Experienced pro photographers know how to work with clients to provide them with the best experience and the best results for their budget, so trust the process, give the not-cheapest photographer the opportunity to help you get you what you need, and here’s to always getting the best photography possible!

 

 

#employeeappreciation, #corporatephotography, #corporateportraits, #authorportraits, #profileportraits, #bookcovers, #portraitphotography, #brandingphotography, #businesslifestylephotography, #notjustaheadshot

 

 

kathryn@hollinrake.com

hollinrake.com


 

Thursday, July 11, 2024

Shooting business portraits on location

 

 

 

We do a lot of business profile portraits, and often we shoot these on location at clients’ offices. Perhaps because of previous experiences, or lack of experience(?), clients are often surprised when they see our set-up, and I am surprised that they are surprised. They express amazement that our set-up is so “professional”. On a side note it occurs to me that this may be why some people expect professional photography to cost less…but I digress.

 

So, I asked assistant Ashley Senja to take a snapshot of me working at a recent shoot and here’s what you can see (this would be a fairly typical profile portrait set-up for us):

 

1 Soft box light modifier (for flattering portrait lighting) mounted on a professional flash unit

 

2 Large, stable tripod, tall enough that I can still shoot from a high, flattering angle even if the subject stands up. The tripod also allows me the flexibility to be able to move away from the camera quickly and easily to interact closely with the client without having to then waste time picking the camera back up, repositioning and refocusing over and over.

 

3 Step ladder to go with the large tripod, so I can shoot from a high, flattering angle and mitigate things like double chins

 

4 Laptop to shoot into from the camera which is tethered to it, allowing us to review image captures and “star” selects (within the capture software)

 

5 External monitor to facilitate client review of image captures as we work together to ensure we have a winning shot (or shots) and to choose the best frame(s) for retouching -- we always recommended ensuring time for this step if time allows

 

6 Background (in this case a green screen to facilitate easy and effective background replacement during retouching…could alternatively be white or gray if background replacement is not required)

 

7 Reflector to brighten the unlit side of the face

 

8 Basic grooming kit including things like blotting papers, hair spray, chap stick, combs, toothpicks, eye glass cleaning wipes, etc.

 

And things you can’t see: the stool the subject is sitting on (we bring that), background light (which happens to be hidden under the table, pointed at the background), back-up camera, extra lenses, extra batteries, back-up lighting…all so that there is no way we will ever be stopped or delayed by equipment  breakage or malfunction…tools, fabric to covers windows or surfaces if necessary, cards and tape in case, for example, we have to cover up a pot light over a subject’s head that can’t be turned off, and other periodically useful things.

 

We never worry about natural, available light (or how that might be affected by weather)…we don’t need it. We never worry if the room is aesthetically pleasing…it doesn’t matter.

A hallmark of the professional photographer is that they can be counted on to consistently produce excellent results no matter the circumstances or the environment, and they can repeat their results in the future, regardless of different environment, timing, etc.   

 

I’ll also just note that I personally like to scout the location prior to the shoot date almost any time we shoot somewhere we haven’t been before, to make sure there are no surprises  for us the day of, and to ensure we have space to shoot conducive to best results, which is easier for me to determine in person than talking back and forth with organizers who might not understand the nuances of what will work best space-wise. I also like to know in advance where we are going to park etc. so we will never be scrambling with logistics on the day.

 

In summary, this is a version of the kind of set-up you should expect when hiring a professional. Here’s to less surprise, more expectation, greater understanding of the nature of and value of professional photography!

 

BTW you could have read this already if you receive my newsletter. If you’d like to sign up…

https://lp.constantcontactpages.com/sl/pykWM5A

 

 

#employeeappreciation, #corporatephotography, #corporateportraits, #authorportraits, #profileportraits, #bookcovers, #portraitphotography, #brandingphotography, #businesslifestylephotography

 

kathryn@hollinrake.com

holllinrake.com