Monday, February 10, 2025

Pay me now or pay me later.

 

You may be able to see the details better if you click to enlarge.

 

My retoucher tells me things. 

 

OK, not really, because I do most of my own retouching. But a colleague of mine who is a professional retoucher sees things I don't see, like photos done by photographers who are less experienced and less detail oriented than another one might be. I wondered why anyone would be unwilling to pay for good photography, but would be willing to pay to fix bad work. Probably because they don’t anticipate the additional cost. When my colleague shared with me some of the things she has been asked to fix I decided to write this post to try to spare whomever I can the pain of totally unnecessarily high retouching bills and time wastage due to backing and forthing by e-mail days and weeks after the shoot.


Wouldn't it be far less painful, and maybe even cost a similar amount to get a good, experienced photographer who knows what to look for while shooting (and tells you how much time you need to get good shots) and just takes good looking photos in the first place? 

 

My illustration is extreme to make a point, but here are some things that aren't uncommon: having one side of a collar pop out from under a jacket lapel, wrinkles, an earring hanging wrong*, lipstick/gloss having partially worn off or hastily applied, mascara smudged, hair on face or food between teeth after lunch.

(*I know you can't really see it here but viewed at full size, or in one of the other frames  where the earring showed more, you'd see it and you'd be bothered.)

 

These are all things that can happen, and that a retoucher may be asked to fix, but could so easily have been avoided with a little care. 

 

Despite the many advantages of digital photography (it's hard to imagine we used to shoot on film and had no Photoshop), when the digital revolution happened it removed a huge barrier to entry into the world of "professional photography" and made way for the notion that "anything can be done in Photoshop." When people proceed with the idea that any number of indiscretions can be fixed in Photoshop, there is a clear path created to a loss of precision and professionalism. 

 

While it may be true that anything can be fixed in Photoshop, there's a cost. Good retouching can cost a lot. The point this that there is risk associated with sloppy photography. From a practical POV, some issues like those on the left photo are not even really fixable, meaning clients end up settling for poor quality, and organizers end up with unhappy bosses.

 

Here's another reason to make sure you hire a good photographer...it is clear to me that there are lots of people who can't really tell the difference between a bad picture and a good one. This is not a criticism...their skill sets lie elsewhere. So if you don't know what's good or bad but you understand that photography is sending a message/telling a story, it really behooves you to hire an expert who does know what makes an excellent photo. Otherwise the story your photo is telling may not be the one you want it to be telling. 

 

While we're here I have a couple of "Don'ts" to pass on regarding portrait wardrobe, because what you wear can play a big part in the success of your photo. Neither the blouse nor the jacket were great choices. Why not? The shape of the jacket and sheen of the fabric meant that unless I could get it to sit perfectly flat on my body (which I couldn't) it would show wrinkles I wouldn't be able to fix in retouching. So make sure your jacket fits and sits well if you wear one. 

 

Also, for some reason, one side of the collar on this jacket tended to stick out way further across the shoulder area than the other side did. I needed fabric tape to pull them in and even them out for the photo on the right. It's rare to have time at a business portrait session to be fiddling around with fabric tape. And the blouse was made of very soft, floppy, wrinkle-prone, patterned fabric. I had to use a lot of fabric tape to get it to hold its shape in the photo on the right, and I still had to retouch it. If your shirt collar can't sit properly without being taped into shape (!) wear a different one.

 

That's it for now. Good luck with your next photo shoot! 

 

kathryn@hollinrake.com

hollinrake.com

corporateportraits.ca

 

 

 

 


Monday, February 3, 2025

Dream Job: The Tour de Bleu Calendar

 

This is the fuzziest photo (or grid of photos) I have ever uploaded and that's on purpose! Sorry. These photos were created to be shared internally by the organization, so I can show you kind of what they looked like, but not who's in them. I wish I could. But, privacy.

 

In the fall of 2024 something wonderful happened. I received an e-mail I almost didn't think was legitimate as it began with "Good Afternoon". But the sender did refer to some specific work on my website that gave them the idea I might be a good fit for their project so I replied.

 

What followed was the commencement of one of the most interesting and creative projects I have done in a while, thanks, to some extent, to a series of fake book covers I did in 2023.

 

The project -- a calendar to feature a series of creative, whimsical and maybe humorous images of twelve Tour de Bleu cyclists and their bikes. The calendar pages would be auctioned off at the Tour de Bleu gala fundraiser;  the models would be the winning bidders. Between 2023 and 2024 the Tour de Bleu raised 11.9 million dollars for the William Osler Health System’s Adolescent Intensive Day Program for youth struggling with self-harm and suicidal thoughts. Here's more about the event and the organization: https://www.petergilganfoundation.org/tour-de-bleu/

 

Particularly given the target charities it took me zero seconds to want to be involved.

 

All I had to do was collaborate, organize and execute twelve photo shoots with some of the busiest people I have ever met.

 

What was so great about this job?

 

I had a lot of creative control. I was allowed to create each image as a stand-alone piece with no stylistic limitations or restrictions...the final set of shots didn't have to match.  I got to bump brains with some very fun and creative people.  I got to see and explore a number of interesting places I would otherwise never have had a chance to see. I got to work with a great new photo assistant, my son (as well as my usual, awesome assistant, Ashley).

 

What were the challenges?

 

In some cases I got to scout the locations prior to the shoot dates, which I always like to do. But even then there were challenges. Logistically and budget-wise we just didn't have the capacity to deal with getting (and paying for) location permits, so where that might have been a thing we knew we'd have to shoot fast. Since we had no time for weather days (ie. postponements) we'd have to shoot rain or shine. Despite my advising that we have back-up inside locations, we were pretty committed to shooting in the various outdoor locations the "models" came up with because they were much more interesting and varied. Thankfully, with seven out of twelve locations being outside, we did not get rained out once. It came close, but you'd never know because I brought the sun with me in my light cases.

 

It was also increasingly cold.  We shot way later into the fall than originally intended due to people's schedules, thus the sparsely leaved trees in at least one of the shots. Another week and we'd have been out of luck at that last location.

 

And I did have to Photoshop in a couple of skies.

 

We went to this park during off-hours, set up and shot very quickly. I had fully pre-visualized what the set-up would be so we were very efficient. We used a fishing rod and fishing line with a safety pin to make the scarf fly.

 

In the case of the red scarf shot (top left in the grid) I knew the way it "flew" in the park would be no good, so it was always my plan to reshoot the scarf in studio (on green screen)  where I'd have more control, and composite it into the final shot. I had to do still more in Photoshop to tweak the flying effect. What I didn't want to have to do in-studio or in Photoshop was create the part of the scarf that went around the model's neck, which is why we also had to shoot the scarf actually on the model on location.

 

Did I mention how busy these people are? To make planning even more of a challenge some of the models were basically voluntold to participate by their bidding "associates". So, one person would bid on a calendar page but assign the photo shoot to someone else. This made for some lengthy and, shall we say, erratic e-mail threads. And instead of photographing twelve people, we ended up photographing twenty-two (because there were groups...surprise!)

 

What else? 

 

Hilariously, although it did not feel hilarious at the time, following the desire of our model I had selected a spot at this location that on the shoot date was totally taken over by this giant window cleaning apparatus. The operator kindly shared with me that they were scheduled to be there for four days. Luckily our model had access to another even better location nearby so we still got a great shot.

 

At one spot downtown our model had requested a certain spot for their shoot. I scouted it in advance so I'd know which angles would work if it was sunny or rainy on the day. We arrive to find an enormous window washing apparatus ensconced in the middle of the space. The operator tells us it will be anchored there for four days. Excellent. There is nowhere in that space we can shoot. This location is unusable. Luckily, our model had some pull and showed us to an even better space. Still outdoors, but not there. Fantastic!

 

And talking about being lucky, after all these years of dreading something  like this happening it finally did. We were on our way out of Toronto to Burlington and as I am pulling away from the pick-up spot for my assistant near Exhibition Place a driver hops out of his car, comes up to my window, and tells me I have a flat tire.

 

Thank goodness I am fanatical about leaving early for shoots. Of course this is the day we have one shoot in the morning in Burlington, requiring the most complicated lighting of any shoot in the project followed by another shoot in Brampton, both on tight schedules. The one in Burlington is at a restaurant that opens at 11:00 so there is no going over...we are supposed to be out of there by 10:30 and absolutely must be out of there by 11:00 a.m. And it was incredibly difficult to even get this shoot booked...rescheduling is not an option.

 

So, by some miracle I am able to limp my car a few yards to the last parking spot in the only parking lot I can see in the area. And I call CAA, while I get my assistant to call a cargo cab. I call my husband who drops everything  (thank goodness it was a day he was in town and could even do that) and picks up my spare key from home on the way. I tell CAA my husband will drive over and meet them at my car. They say no go; their memberships are with people, not their cars. So I buy my husband a CAA membership and Bob's your uncle! We unload my car into the cargo van and head to Burlington. The driver says we have to pay $45 cash and it's $20 extra for the cargo. Who carries that kind of cash these days? Miracle, I had it! We're only half an hour late. We set up like lightning and we get the shot. Everyone is happy. We call another cargo cab who lets us pay by credit card and quietly says it's $10 extra for the cargo, as if we might have a problem with this (so looks like they make up the cargo rate on the spot based on what they think people will pay), and we go back to my car. It's all fixed. We drive to Brampton. After shoot #2 I drop my assistant at her home and buy my husband a bottle of his favourite scotch. How lucky were we?

 

Originally we thought we'd schedule the twelve shoots over six shoot dates...two per day over three weekends. So cute we thought we could make that happen. We ended up shooting on ten different dates, weekdays and weekends. I had also been under the impression everyone to be photographed was in Toronto. If you count Burlington, Brampton, Milton and Peterborough as Toronto then yes, we shot in Toronto. I spent fifteen hours location scouting and that wasn't even all the locations. The fastest shoot was probably less than half an hour...good thing I'd scouted that one. But on average they were maybe two hours all in including set-up and tear down.

 

I don't even know how many hours I spent on post-production. In several of the shots I wanted the bikes to look as if they were moving but we had to shoot them standing still. As an example, in one shot a family of three kids on bikes and a scooter was to appear to be winning a race with their competitive racer parent. It would have been virtually impossible to photograph them in the park with the background I wanted, with artificial light (assistant holding my flash)  if I had allowed them to actually ride, so on my count they all hopped up onto their bikes and the little guy on the scooter shot his foot out behind him, over and over until I had the shot. They did a great acting job. But, if I hadn't added motion blur in post (not as quick and easy as one might think) it would have looked boring and static.

 

I also learned that cleats and clip-in pedals are not conducive to balancing on an unsupported, stationary bike. Noted!

 

So those are the highlights of my 2024 dream job. Overall, a very challenging job, but worth it in so many ways. They will almost certainly never read this, but a huge thanks to the people who helped herd the cats including executive assistants whose job I would never want. This project took over much of my mind, and many chunks of time for the better part of two months. Thank-you to the donors for allowing me into their busy lives to create art with, and out of them, including one major collaborator who lent me his studio, his creativity and his considerable energy for our shoot together...he knows who he is.   

 

It's not often a job like this comes along. I met some of the nicest and most inspiring people. I'm proud of the images we created together. And next time, now that the first calendar has been distributed to the group, at least donors will know what they're signing up for!

 

 

kathryn@hollinrake.com

hollinrake.com

corporateportraits.ca

Tuesday, January 14, 2025

Serious profile photos


 

Let's be serious.

 

Just kidding. But I am going to touch on the idea of the "serious" business photo.

 

One of the first questions clients often ask is: "Should I smile?"

And generally, the answer is that you should do whatever feels and looks like you, with the caveat that you are trying to initiate connection with people, and people generally respond more favourably to someone who appears to be, if not outright joyful, at least approachable. 

 

I've written about this before. As have so many. In fact it was ten years ago (!) that I found (and shared) a handy diagrammatic breakdown of what one organization has determined makes the perfect profile photo -- https://photofeeler-blog.s3.amazonaws.com/perfect-photo-infographic.jpg

-- and you can see that, according to them, smiles are really important. 

 

However, sometimes there are good reasons not to smile. Some people just aren't smiley. Sometimes a smiley photo just wouldn't feel right, if, say, you are the CEO of a funeral home, or work in a similarly serious organization. Even so, I just wanted to make the point in this post that there is (scary) serious, and there's (still approachable) serious. And no matter who you are, if you are using a profile photo at all, I suggest it will most likely serve you better if you look at least somewhat accessible. Unless anger is your brand.

 

As always my suggestions are presented to help most people, most of the time. They are not rules, and they don't cover every circumstance.

 

Always remember what the goal of your profile portrait is. And remember that generally you want to draw people towards you, not frighten them off.  

 

kathryn@hollinrake.com

hollinrake.com 

corporateportraits.ca